The Vatican more liberal than the US bishops on same-sex marriage?

The Vatican’s top official on family life endorsed legal protections for same-sex couples in his first public press conference in the Vatican earlier this week. Reporting on the first Vaitican press conference by the head of the Pontifical Council for the Family, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, Religion News Service wrote:

Paglia conceded that there are several kinds of “cohabitation forms that do not constitute a family,” and that their number is growing. Paglia suggested that nations could find “private law solutions” to help individuals who live in non-matrimonial relations, “to prevent injustice and make their life easier.”

He also said he would “like the church to fight against” sodomy laws in the nations where they’re still in effect.

Paglia, of course, reiterated a firm opposition to recognizing same-sex marriages, saying, “The church must defend the truth, and the truth is that a marriage is only between a man and a woman.”

But if his statements truly reflect the church’s official position, then the Holy See now seems to be to the left of its bishops in many countries—including the United States.

Yesterday, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops reportedly sent a missive to the White House threatening to help block an immigration reform package if it would smooth the immigration path for same-sex partners of American citizens.

The USCCB would not make the letter public, but the bishops’ spokesperson, Sister Mary Anne Walsh, told the Associated Press that inclusion of these provisions—which have been endorsed by the White House—could “jeopardizes passage of the bill.” This threat is shocking because immigration reform has been a major priority for the U.S. church, and one of the few big issues in which it has seen eye-to-eye with the Democratic Party.

The immigration reform package recently unveiled by President Barack Obama proposes treating “same-sex families as families by giving U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents the ability to seek a visa on the basis of a permanent relationship with a same-sex partner.”

The Chilean Church has also staked out a position to the right of this new line from the Vatican in its fight against President Sebastián Piñera’s proposal to provide some protections to same-sex couples, called “Acuerdo de Vida en Pareja.” This translates more or less to a Life Partnership Agreement, and it would be a civil contract that mostly protects the property rights of same-sex couples.

During a hearing last month in the Chilean senate, Bishop Juan Ignacio González testified that even this level of protection would lead to “the destruction of human beings and …. destruction to social and family peace among men.”

Similarly, Catholic hierarchy helped kill a Costa Rican civil union law late last year, pronouncing that recognition of same-sex couples “distorts the perception of fundamental moral values and undermines the institution of marriage.”

Of course, it’s an open question whether Paglia actually is voicing church policy or whether the church intends to follow his words with actions. His call to decriminalize sodomy seems especially contradictory given that the pope gave a special blessing in December to the member of parliament from Uganda who is pushing the “Kill the Gays” bill.

We have seen some softening of the hard-line against protections for same-sex couples in countries where the church is losing the fight over same-sex marriage. In Uruguay, for example, where the Congress is expected to pass an “Equal Marriage Law” this spring, the country’s top bishop has endorsed civil unions, hoping to head off full marriage rights.

The Vatican may be similarly moderating its line as it sees how quickly it is losing the marriage debate on its home continent. It will be interesting to see how long bishops in other places where the same-sex marriage movement is gaining ground—including the United States—will hold onto their hardline position.

Obama administration toots its gay-rights horn

A post on the White House website outlines a litany of things the Obama administration has done to promote gay rights abroad. And as self-serving as these kinds of statements are (especially coming as LGBT activists are squeezing the prez on opposing Prop 8 before the court), it is worth noting how different the US’s position on the global stage has been since Obama took over from Bush.

Historically, European governments and Brazil have been leaders in promoting gay rights, but the US now has a much larger leadership role. Of course, this can be a mixed blessing in places like Kenya, where the LGBT movement is attacked as a product of meddling by western powers.

Read the White House’s statement here.

Why a “gay Roe vs Wade” is unlikely

Andrew Sullivan wrote last night that part of him is hoping the U.S. Supreme Court issues a narrow ruling in the gay marriage cases. He said:

To my mind, that smaller decision would be a relief. Why? Because I do not want a gay Roe vs Wade, a decision that appears to foist a premature answer on a still-not-entirely-convinced public.

Sullivan talks himself out of this desire by focusing on the “moral clarity of our cause,” which he thinks demands the court strike down all bans on same-sex marriage. But there’s a historical reason why he could breathe easier about the risk of a backlash.

The conservative movement has already won as much as it can on the gay marriage issue. Continue reading

The downside of marriage equality for one gay Mexican

Well, it looks like LGBT rights advances in Mexico aren’t a plus for all Mexicans.

At least not for Efren Neri-Garcia, who fled Mexico in 1994 and sought asylum in the United States claiming he was persecuted for being gay. Eighteen years later, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the US has the right to deport him.

The immigration judge who ruled on the case before it reached the appeals court said that Neri-Garcia’s experience explains why he initially fled Mexico; his claim might have been valid when he first came to the United States. The appeals court summarized:

[Neri-Garcia] testified to discrimination,  threats, and physical attacks by family members, fellow students, and police officers. Nearly three decades ago police officers arrested him for a theft he did not commit  and then tortured him to extract a confession. Following his conviction for that crime in 1984, he was incarcerated in a penitentiary in Guadalajara, where he was housed with psychiatric patients because he is gay.

But the judge “discounted” Neri-Garcia’s claims that violence against gays remains so prevalent in Mexico that he can’t return. Continue reading

NJ Archbishop: Support gay marriage, skip communion

I don’t know if Newark Archbishop John J. Myers is the first bishop to say supporters of gay marriage shouldn’t take communion, but it certainly took me by surprise. In a statement to be made public today, Myers is telling New Jersey Catholics who disagree with the church’s teachings on gay marriage to “refrain from receiving Holy Communion,” according to the North Jersey Record.

During all my time in Argentina–the 80 percent Catholic country where gay marriage has now been legal for two years–I never heard about a political litmus test for receiving communion. I also never heard about priests denying communion to the politicians who voted in favor of the gay marriage bill, the way some American Catholic leaders have advocated for politicians who support abortion rights.

I actually asked about this during my interview with Father Alberto Bochatey, head of the University Catolica Argentina’s Marriage and Family Institute. Continue reading